News in brief:
– EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen withdraws the proposed pesticide law, a key component of the European Green Deal, amidst strong opposition from the agricultural sector and widespread farmer protests.
– She said the fight to regulate pesticide use within the bloc is still on the agenda but may require a more suble approach.
According to Euronews, Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, announced the withdrawal of a contentious law aimed at reducing pesticide use across the European Union on Tuesday. The law, known as the Sustainable Use Regulation (SUR), was first proposed in June 2022 as part of the ambitious Green Deal initiative.
The withdrawal of SUR marks a significant development for local farmers, who have been at the forefront of opposition to the law. Chemical pesticides, commonly used in agriculture to maintain crop yields, have been linked to various environmental and health concerns. Despite its intended environmental benefits, the proposed regulation faced strong resistance from the agricultural sector.
Political and public pressure
The decision to withdraw SUR comes amidst mounting pressure from right-wing factions and widespread protests by farmers. Von der Leyen cited the lack of progress and polarisation surrounding the proposal as key reasons for its withdrawal.
During her address to the European Parliament, she acknowledged the challenges faced by farmers, including climate change, geopolitical tensions, and economic hardships. She emphasised the need for a more sustainable approach to farming while recognising the importance of listening to the concerns of farmers.
While the withdrawal of SUR is a setback for environmental advocates, Von der Leyen affirmed that the issue of pesticide regulation remains on the agenda. However, any future proposals are likely to undergo a more inclusive and collaborative process.
The decision to shelve the pesticide law has elicited mixed reactions from various stakeholders. Agricultural lobbyists and conservative leaders welcomed the move, citing concerns about the law’s feasibility and impact on farmers. In contrast, environmental organisations expressed disappointment, emphasising the urgent need for effective measures to address pesticide use.
